S4.11.8 Chapter 8
Weighing up nuclear power
People disagree about nuclear power. What is true about it, and what do we have to weigh up?
Your guess
Pick one before you read on. It is fine to be wrong.
By the end you can
- Compare nuclear power with fossil fuels and renewables
- Explain how nuclear waste is stored safely
This book has described the science. This chapter asks you to use it to judge. There is no perfect way to make electricity. Every source has gains and costs, and sensible people weigh them differently. Here are the facts that go on the scales.
Start with the fuel. Burning coal, oil or gas gives out carbon dioxide, which adds to climate change, and also soot and other pollution. These fuels will run out, because they took millions of years to form. Their power stations are quicker to build than nuclear ones.
Renewable sources, such as wind, sun and water, need no fuel and give out no carbon dioxide while working. But wind and sunshine change with the weather and the time of day. So the supply is not steady, and backup or storage is needed. Hydroelectric power needs a suitable river and valley.
Nuclear power sits between these. A power station gives out almost no carbon dioxide when it runs. The fuel takes little room. One uranium fuel pellet, the size of a fingertip, holds as much energy as about a tonne of coal.
A reactor also runs almost all the time, in any weather, day and night. A typical one is working for more than 8 hours in every 10. That makes it a steady supply, which suits a country whose use never stops.
To make a fair comparison we must count carbon dioxide over the whole life of a source, not only while it runs. Building, mining, making and taking apart all add some. The table gives rounded middle values from reviews of many studies by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Worked example
A home uses 3 000 kWh of electricity in a year. How much carbon dioxide, in kg, is given out if all of it came from coal, at 820 g for each kWh?
- carbon dioxide = grams for each kWh × kWh.
- carbon dioxide = 820 × 3 000 = 2 460 000 g.
- 1 000 g = 1 kg, so 2 460 000 g ÷ 1 000 = 2 460 kg.
Answer: 2 460 kg
The same home on nuclear power, at 12 g for each kWh, would cause 36 kg, which is far less. On wind it would be the same. The table shows that nuclear power and wind have among the lowest values, with solar next, and coal and gas far higher.
Cost is a second item. A nuclear power station is expensive and slow to build, often taking many years. Once built, its fuel is cheap, and it can run for decades. At the end, taking it apart safely, called decommissioning, takes years and money too.
Safety is the third. Serious accidents at nuclear power stations are very rare. The ones at Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011 spread radioactive material, forced people to leave their homes and contaminated land. Yet nuclear power has caused far fewer deaths than coal, oil and gas for each unit of energy. This counts deaths from air pollution. Estimates differ.
The fourth is waste. Burning fuel leaves ash and gives out gases. A reactor gives out no carbon dioxide, but it leaves nuclear waste, which is radioactive. The amount is small, but it must be kept safe for as long as it stays dangerous.
Waste comes in three groups. Low level waste is gloves, overalls and tools that are lightly contaminated. It is only weakly radioactive, so it can be buried in shallow sites. These sites are watched for a few hundred years. Intermediate waste, such as reactor parts and filters, is sealed in concrete or steel.
High level waste is the used fuel. It holds the fission products and some heavy nuclei made in the reactor. It is very radioactive and hot, but it is a small volume. Most of the waste is low level. Only a small part is high level.
It is stored in steps. First the used fuel is cooled for some years in deep pools of water. The water takes the heat away and shields the radiation. Then it is sealed in thick steel and concrete casks, which are kept above ground, guarded and watched.
Why a deep store? The decay of the waste depends on half-lives. Strontium 90 and caesium 137 have half-lives of about 30 years. Some other nuclei last far longer. Plutonium 239 has a half-life of about 24 000 years, and a few have half-lives of millions of years. So the waste must be kept apart for many thousands of years. It goes in a place that stays dry and still, deep in stable rock.
Worked example
A sample of waste has a half-life of 30 years. Its count rate is 800 counts/min. How long until it falls to 100 counts/min?
- Halve the count rate until you reach 100: 800 → 400 → 200 → 100.
- That is 3 half-lives.
- time = 3 × 30 years = 90 years.
Answer: 90 years
There is a link to the half-life. A short half-life means strong radiation now, but it soon fades. A long half-life means weaker radiation, but for a very long time. The waste needs shielding for the first, and isolation for the second.
A wrong idea many people have
All nuclear waste stays dangerous for tens of thousands of years.
Why it feels right: We hear that waste lasts for ages, and the longest half-lives get the most attention.
The test that breaks it: Look at the three groups. Most waste, by volume, is low level and only weakly radioactive. Only the high level waste is strongly radioactive, with very long half-lives.
What is true: Most nuclear waste is low level and only weakly radioactive. A small part is high level, and some of that needs isolation for a very long time. This is why it goes to a deep store.
Try it
Count the carbon dioxide from a lamp
You need: paper, a pencil.
- A 100 W lamp is on for 10 hours each day for 100 days. Change the power to kW: 100 W is 0.1 kW.
- Work out the hours: 10 × 100 = 1 000 hours.
- Energy = power × time. Work out the energy in kWh.
- Carbon dioxide in grams = grams for each kWh × kWh. Do this for coal at 820, gas at 490 and wind at 12.
- Change each answer to kg by dividing by 1 000. Write the three answers in a table.
What you will see: The energy is 0.1 × 1 000 = 100 kWh for every source. The carbon dioxide is very different: 82 kg for coal, 49 kg for gas and 1.2 kg for wind. The same lamp, the same light, a very different effect.
So how do we decide? A country with plenty of wind, sun or rivers may choose one way. A country that needs a steady supply, with little space or sun, may choose another. Many countries use a mix. The science tells us the gains and costs. The choice is for people to make, with the facts in front of them.
Key words
- nuclear waste
- radioactive material left over from a nuclear reactor or from its use.
- high level waste
- the used fuel, which is very radioactive and needs long isolation.
- decommissioning
- taking a power station apart safely at the end of its life.
Back to your guess
The answer is D: It gives almost no carbon dioxide, but it leaves radioactive waste that must be kept safe for a very long time.
Nuclear power gives very little carbon dioxide, and a small amount of fuel gives a great deal of energy. But the waste stays radioactive for a long time, and a reactor is costly to build. Each source has gains and costs.
Check yourself
Try each one before you look. A wrong answer tells you where to go next.
Which is an advantage of nuclear power over burning coal?
See the answer
It gives out almost no carbon dioxide when making electricity.
Fission gives out no carbon dioxide while a station runs. Over the whole life, nuclear power is among the lowest sources.
- If you chose A: It does need waste storage. Coal leaves ash and gases, and nuclear leaves radioactive waste.
- If you chose C: A nuclear power station is costly and slow to build. Its fuel is cheap, though.
- If you chose D: It needs uranium fuel. The amount is small, but it is not zero.
Why can wind power alone not give a steady supply of electricity?
See the answer
The output depends on the weather.
When the wind drops, the turbines give less. So wind needs storage or a backup, such as other power stations.
- If you chose A: Wind gives very little carbon dioxide over its life.
- If you chose B: Wind needs no fuel. That is one of its gains.
- If you chose D: Wind makes no radioactive waste.
Why is high level waste kept away from people for a very long time?
See the answer
Some of it has long half-lives, so it stays radioactive for a long time.
The count rate halves once in each half-life. For nuclei with half-lives of thousands of years, that takes a very long time, so the waste is isolated.
- If you chose B: Waste does not explode. The danger is its radiation, which falls only slowly.
- If you chose C: It does not grow. Its radioactivity falls with time, at a rate set by the half-life. Go to S4.11.3.
- If you chose D: It is cooled first, in water. It is kept away because it stays radioactive.
Which statement about nuclear waste is true?
See the answer
Most of it is low level and only weakly radioactive. A small part is high level and needs long isolation.
Low level waste, such as gloves and tools, is most of the volume and is only weakly radioactive. High level waste is a small part and is isolated in deep stores.
- If you chose A: Most waste by volume is low level and decays quickly. Only part of the high level waste lasts that long.
- If you chose B: It is all radioactive, which is why it is called nuclear waste. The levels differ.
- If you chose C: Some waste has a half-life of years, and some of thousands of years. Not all of it is gone in a week.
Some waste has a half-life of 50 years. How long will it take for its radioactivity to fall to one eighth?
See the answer
150 years
1 → 1/2 → 1/4 → 1/8 is three halvings. 3 × 50 = 150 years.
- If you chose A: That is one half-life, which leaves a half. An eighth is three half-lives. Go to S4.11.3.
- If you chose B: That is two half-lives, which leaves a quarter. An eighth is three half-lives. Go to S4.11.3.
- If you chose D: You multiplied 8 by 50. The number of half-lives is 3, because 1 → 1/2 → 1/4 → 1/8. Go to S4.11.3.
Which statement is a fair way to compare sources of electricity?
See the answer
Every source has costs and risks, and people weigh them differently.
The facts about carbon dioxide, cost, safety, waste and steady supply point in different ways for different sources. A fair comparison keeps all of them in view.
- If you chose A: It has real risks and costs, such as waste, cost and the chance of an accident.
- If you chose C: Coal gives out the most carbon dioxide, and air pollution from it harms many people.
- If you chose D: Wind and sun change with the weather, so they need storage or backup.
From an earlier chapter
In a reactor, each fission causes exactly one more fission on average. What kind of chain reaction is this?
See the answer
A steady, controlled one.
One more fission for each fission keeps the number steady, and so the heat output is steady. Control rods hold it there.
- If you chose A: It grows only if each fission causes more than one more. Here it causes exactly one. Go to S4.11.7.
- If you chose B: It is what control rods are for. They keep the average at one. Go to S4.11.7.
- If you chose C: Fusion joins nuclei. A chain of fissions is a different process. Go to S4.11.7.
The graph shows the count rate of a sample of waste. How long does it take for the count rate to fall to a quarter of its start?
See the answer
48 years
The curve falls from 640 to 320 at 24 years, so the half-life is 24 years. A quarter is two half-lives, which is 2 × 24 = 48 years.
A home uses 2 000 kWh of electricity in a year. Gas gives out 490 g of carbon dioxide for each kWh. How much carbon dioxide is that, in kg?
See the answer
980 kg
490 × 2 000 = 980 000 g. 980 000 ÷ 1 000 = 980 kg.
A sample of waste has a half-life of 30 years and a count rate of 960 counts/min. What is its count rate after 120 years?
See the answer
60 counts/min
120 ÷ 30 = 4 half-lives. 960 → 480 → 240 → 120 → 60. The count rate is 60 counts/min.
Keep it
Copy this into your exercise book.
Nuclear: almost no CO₂ in use, little fuel, steady, but costly, slow to build, and it leaves waste. Waste: low level, intermediate, high level. High level is cooled, sealed, then kept deep in rock. Every source has gains and costs.
Draw: Three boxes joined by arrows: used fuel in water, then in a steel cask, then in a deep store in rock.